AI-powered tax research has passed the tipping point. Is your firm ready?
For the past few years, AI in tax research has been something firms were "trying." That's no longer the case. According to new data from Blue J and CPA.com, adoption has nearly doubled in a single year, and the profession has quietly crossed a threshold: AI-powered tax research is no longer an experiment. It's infrastructure.
The 2026 AI Tax Research Solution Outlook Report, based on survey responses from 1,000 U.S.-based accountants who perform tax research regularly, captures this shift in real time. And for MACPA members weighing whether — or how — to bring AI into their own research workflows, the findings offer a rare, data-backed look at what's actually happening inside firms right now, not just what vendors are promising.
Produced annually by Blue J and CPA.com, the report is a reliable pulse check on how the profession is actually using AI, not just how it talks about using it. This year's edition surfaces a finding that may surprise skeptics: As firms lean further into AI, they're becoming more focused on the judgment, relationships, and advisory skill that AI can't replace.
Last year, only 33% of respondents said their firm had adopted AI-powered tax research. This year, that number has climbed to 60%. At the same time, the share of firms actively considering adoption in the near future grew from 20% to 32%. Put simply: The firms sitting on the sidelines are a shrinking group, and the ones still deciding are moving faster than ever toward "yes."
Adoption isn't just growing — it's spreading across more of the day-to-day work tax professionals actually do. Respondents who've adopted AI reported using it heavily in advisory-related workflows, with advisory projects (44%) and tax planning (40%) topping the list. This isn't a tool firms are running in the background for a narrow use case. It's becoming embedded in the work that drives the most value for clients.
Time savings remain the headline benefit — 84% of respondents cited it, up slightly from 83% last year. But the more interesting story is what firms are doing with that reclaimed time. Half of respondents said they're redirecting time savings toward faster client responses and project delivery. Nearly as many (47%) are using it to improve staff work-life balance, and 46% are channeling it into higher-quality client advice.
That reallocation is also starting to reshape how firms think about billing. Among AI adopters, 69% are considering moving away from the traditional hourly model in favor of value-based, hybrid, or fixed-fee alternatives — a signal that AI adoption isn't just a workflow change, it's a business model conversation.
Perhaps the most notable finding runs counter to a common worry about AI: that it might crowd out professional judgment. The data suggests the opposite. Seventy-seven percent of respondents who've adopted AI-powered tax research say it's actually given them more headspace to exercise that judgment — not less. As routine research tasks get faster, the human expertise that clients are paying for gets more room to show up.
For firms still relying on legacy research tools or manual processes, the gap between "trying AI" and "relying on AI" is widening quickly — with real consequences for efficiency, client responsiveness, and talent retention. The Outlook Report digs into all of this in far more detail, including workflow-by-workflow adoption data, firm-size breakdowns, and what adopters wish they'd known before rolling AI out, so you can benchmark your own firm against where the profession actually stands today.
MACPA members can download the complete 2026 AI Tax Research Solution Outlook Report, produced by Blue J and CPA.com, for free here.
MACPA members can access Blue J for just $1,198 — that’s $300 the standard Blue J rate. For more information, you can visit the Blue J and MACPA landing page.